Foundations of Machine Learning
STAT 535 Autumn Quarter 2023

Home

Course Description

Syllabus

Books and other resources

Class mailing list

 

Assignments

Handouts/Course notes

UW Statistics

Project

[ Generalities ] [ Data sets ] [ Methods ] [ Software ] [ Time line ] [ Report ] [ Results ]

Each project will have the same training set as starting point. You will perform binary class classification on this data. You will train an assigned predictor as well as a predictor of your choice for this task, and do all you can to obtain a low expected classification error.

The classification loss L is the 0-1 loss, valued at 1 for misclassifying an example 0 for correct classification.
You will have to submit a report (up to 10 pages) about what you did, submit your code (excluding the packages you may have used). A few days before the last day of classes, we will provide a test set with hidden labels. You will run your predictor on the test set and submit the results, which I and Vydhourie will evaluate. In the same class, we'll unveil and compare the results.

Data sets the data is a subset of Inverter Clipping Data, made available by the DuraMAT Durable Materials Consortium. The original data represents power output over time from a cluster of solar panels. This is actual data from a working solar farm. We have curated the data by separating sequences of length l=100, and in addition we have precalculated 4 features described in the paper. The features are the normalized AC power, the simple moving average of the time series, the maximum rolling range of the time series, and the mounting configuration, together with time (in Hour-Minute). The training set containing 120,000 examples. The data sets for training are available on canvas under "Files Project" folder. Note that the dataset is presented in a .csv format to reduce file sizes. More instructions will come later. Use these data as you wish to obtain your predictor. Later, we will post an unlabeled test set, with the same format, on which you will test the predictor you obtained.

Methods for classification You will use the data made available to construct two different predictors. You need to register the first predictor (more instructions later) by Nov 20. Below is a list of possible predictors, and your Predictor 1 has to be from this list. Predictor 2 can be any other type of predictor. This way, collectively, we will explore a large range of predictors, and each of you will have a chance to have a really good prediction error.

No matter what method you choose, you are responsible for knowing how this method works, and for explaining how you chose parameters for training. Demonstrating that you understand how to use a predictor is the most important goal of this project.
For any method, you should explore the data first, and do some preprocessing. In particular, you can derive new features from the existing ones, or you can define a particular type of "distance".

Software resources You are allowed to download software for this project. In this case, you must know intimately what the software is doing in the context of your project. You must also demonstrate by your project that you mastered various issues of the process of data analysis/prediction. You will be graded mostly (this will become more precise eventually) on your intellectual contribution to the project and only secondarily on the performance/sophistication of the methods borrowed from others.

Time line
Data available Nov 20
choose method Nov 20
Test set available Dec 4 noon
Test results due Dec 5, midnight 11:59pm
Award ceremony Dec 7 lecture
Submit report Dec 9 midnight 11:59pm
Report outline
  • Preprocessing, what feature set you used
  • Predictor(s): complete model description, parametrization
  • Basic training algorithm(s): what algorithm, what parameters, anything unusual you did. Do not reproduce the algorithms from books or lecture unless you make modifications.
  • Training strategy. Reproducible description of what you did for training (e.g training set sizes, number epochs, how initialized, did you do CV or model selection)
  • Experimental results, e.g learning curve(s), training (validation) losses, estimated parameter values if they are interpretable and plottable. Be selectivein what you show! Credit will given for careful analysis or visualization of the results.
  • Estimate of the average loss L. Optionally, an interval [Lmin, Lmax] where you believe L will be, and how you estimated these.
  • Optional: references
  • Total length: no more than 5 pages of contents, with extra pages containing references or figures, up to no more than 10 pages total.
In writing the report, assume that the readers (=instructor and TA) are very familiar with all the predictors and with machine learning terminology; there is no need to reproduce textbook like defintions (and there would be no space for it). What the reader need to know are the specifics of what you did with these predictors. What parameters you used for learning, what inputs, and if there were any variations from the standard methods. For example, if you use a Random Forests package, although we know what a RF is, assume we don't know what variant of RF the package implements, or what the parameters mean. You need to specify these in your report.
How to submit your test set results

 


Marina Meila
Last modified: Sat Nov 30 15:43:52 PST 2013 >>>>>>> 9f548f6c949b352d0afee16f9376ac0a08d62fb4